In the architectonic field, the study, comparison, and connection of morphological properties are crucial to approach a building analysis. Its formal complexity depends on the relationships and inferences between the shapes, according to their spatial and functional hierarchical system. Digital technologies open today new opportunities for the cross-analysis of many cultural heritage artifacts, afar in space but close in features (typologies, styles, compositional rules), stimulating the creation of innovative scientific frameworks. Editors: Livio De Luca and Michele RussoThis goal shifts the focus to the analysis of architectural heritage\u2019s geometric nature towards a new generation of semantic-aware digital models. Beyond the generation of accurate reality-based 3D models, creating an interpretative geometric representation of architectural shapes is essential. It involves researches on shape grammars, parametric modeling, and multi-purposes interpretative models, as well as on the formalisation of historic knowledge. Besides, the integration of AR and MR tools in situ allows reaching a more immersive visualization, improving the analysis of the real world. Finally, as the object\u2019s shape analysis frequently involves interpretation of similarity metrics, artificial intelligence is opening new scenarios in the massive analysis, classification, and morphology segmentation.
\nThe architectonic shape analysis involves different cognitive processes based on traditional and digital methods. The definition of experimental paths to study these shapes and their hierarchical relations is an open topic. The ability to combine theoretical knowledge with technological evolution is a cultural challenge. It moves towards a sustainable framework to merge human-driven interpretation and computer-based massive analysis within cross-disciplinary approaches. This journal issue collects research that may clarify this ongoing transition, opening some future scenarios. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:\u00a0Knowledge-based 3D imaging approach to represent the geometrical nature of architectural elements;\u00a0Semantic modeling methodologies for architecture interpretation and data integration;\u00a0Comparative analysis and multi-criteria classification methods, tools and applications;\u00a0AR\/MR approaches to geometrical shapes in-situ analysis, understanding, and story-telling;\u00a0Innovative AI experiences for classification, annotation, and segmentation of architectural models.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","format":"standard","topic":[544,423,425,192,429,543,609,146,527,442,591,444,574,446,448,635,528,465,467,615,469,470,563,478,492],"country":[25],"nsj_language":[57,56],"class_list":["post-1793","call_for_papers","type-call_for_papers","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","topic-aec-design-tools","topic-archaeological-heritage","topic-architectural-heritage","topic-artificial-intelligence","topic-augmented-reality","topic-building-information-modelling-bim","topic-caad-systems","topic-communication","topic-criticism","topic-cultural-heritage","topic-cultural-landscape","topic-digital-modeling","topic-digital-representation","topic-digital-technologies","topic-drawing","topic-future-developments","topic-human-computer-interface","topic-ict","topic-industry-4-0","topic-innovative-technologies","topic-interdisciplinarity-approach","topic-internet-of-things","topic-modeling","topic-parametric-design","topic-representation","country-italy","nsj_language-english","nsj_language-italian"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n